You have to be registered and logged in for purchasing articles.

Abstract

Comparison of High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Serum Assay Results Obtained Using Dade-Behring BNII Nephelometer and Ortho Vitros FS 5.1 Clinical Analyzer in Respect of CRP-Related Risk Assessment of Chronic Metabolic Diseases by Beata Kusnierz-Cabala, Wojciech Gernand, Anna Zabek-Adamska, Aleksandra Tokarz, Jerzy W. Naskalski

Background: Serum concentration of high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) can predict the risk of chronic metabolic and cardiovascular diseases but it is unclear whether turbidimetric high sensitive assays of CRP are adequate.

Methods: Concentrations of serum CRP in 126 samples of serum were measured with high-sensitivity methods using nephelometry (BN II Nephelometer) and turbidimetry (Ortho Vitros FS 5.1).

Results: For CRP concentrations measured by nephelometry and turbidimetry intra-assay CVs were 3.2 and 0.9% at mean CRP concentrations of 1.4 and 2.1 mg/l, inter-assay CVs for commercial controls were 3.1% and 3.6% at mean concentrations of 1.3 and 1.7 mg/l, and mean biases were 7.62% and 2.26%, respectively. Measurements were strongly, linearly correlated (r=0.99; CRPVitros=0.03+1.03CRPBNII). When disease risk was assessed by nephelometry and turbidimetry, results were similar. If the risk of disease was classified as moderate (1.03.0 mg/l), the frequency of misclassified cases was only 2.3 and 2.1%, respectively. The classification agreement weighted ĸ coefficient was 0.94 (95% C.I.: 0.89-0.98).

Conclusions: turbidimetric high sensitive CRP assays can properly classify CRP-related prediction of chronic metabolic diseases with special consideration on cardiovascular risk.

DOI: Clin. Lab. 2008;54:341-346